| Department | Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission PAEC. |
| Job type | Government Job |
| Req. Education | Matric, Intermediate (FA/ FSc/ ICS), Bachelor |
| Location Quota | Pakistan (All Pakistanis are eligible to apply) |
| Last Date to Apply | 18 September 2022 |
Available Vacancies:
- Scientific Assistant – I
- Technician – III
- Junior Assistant – I Admin
- Junior Assistant – II Admin
- Scientific Assistant – II Physics
- Tech – II Mechanical
- Tech – II Medical
- Scientific Assistant – III Physics
- Driver – III
Applying Process & terms for Vacant Job Posts:
Job Advertisement Paper:
PREDICTABLY, Imran Khan’s latest remarks on the issue of the appointment of the new army chief have provoked an excessive response from both the political and army leadership.
His feedback that the ruling parties were “afraid that if a robust and patriotic military leader is appointed then he could ask them approximately the looted wealth”, is visible as a try and “discredit and undermine” the senior management of the Pakistan Army.
It is indeed a reckless and irresponsible declaration from the previous top minister, bringing the confrontation with his erstwhile consumers to a head. Tensions between the 2 have been constructed since the fall of the PTI authorities in April however the cleavage now appears unbridgeable, with both sides taking the gloves off.
Although Imran Khan’s trendy assault regarded directed particularly in opposition to the federal authorities it went wide off the mark. He has now not most effectively accused the PDM management of looking to deliver in a navy chief of its own choice but has additionally questioned the patriotism of the leader who could be appointed. Such a differentiation would make any destiny military leadership debatable.
It isn't unexpected that Khan’s comments have drawn a sturdy reaction from the military excessive command. It is being visible as a try to ‘politicize’ and ‘scandalize’ the complete procedure of choice of the military chief. The statement turned into issued at a time when the appointment of a new leader in November is drawing near.
Although Imran Khan’s attack seemed directed especially against the authorities it become huge off the mark.
The former prime minister is playing a dangerous recreation that would have large political results for his birthday celebration. Such pressure strategies cannot win him back the support of the security establishment that he's so desperately in search of. His try to divide the navy rank and document may also derail the whole democratic political process within the country.
Khan’s tenor is turning more and more aggressive whilst his recognition rises. There is likewise a feeling of frustration. His desperation appears to have intensified together with his failure to push for early elections.
The arrest of Shahbaz Gill, his chief team of workers, on sedition costs, and the crackdown on the PTI’s social media activists have improved his sense of lack of confidence. He regularly warns about being pushed to the wall. The ban at the live telecast of his rallies and speeches appeared to enhance his apprehension of the noose being tightened around him.
Read: Who might be the following army chief?
His anti-status quo stance is likewise driven by the aid of worry of a circulating to disqualify him from politics. He is now facing trial on several fees, starting from contempt of court to terrorism and receiving unauthorized investment for his birthday party.
It won't be viable to oust a popular chief from politics but Imran Khan’s personal hubris and recklessness should thwart his hopes of returning to energy quickly.
While rejecting parliament, Imran Khan is now in an open war of words with nearly every nation's organization. His modern-day feedback concerning the navy leader’s appointment might also create a wedge in his own celebration. Many senior party participants discover it extremely tough to protect their feedback. Their public explanation sounds unconvincing.
The query of who would appoint the new military chief in November has been riding Pakistan’s present-day political disaster. It became believed to be one of the reasons why Imran Khan’s government turned into toppled. It was said that the former prime minister was planning to choose a ‘favorite’ for the effective put up and set up a military-sponsored authoritarian rule.
Ironically, Imran Khan’s comments echo the same worries approximately his rivals appointing a chief in their choice. What political events fail to research are some simple training from our history. It doesn’t rely on who appoints whom — in the end, a navy leader will only serve his institution. It definitely would not have mattered if Imran Khan have been allowed to rent the army leader. The apprehensions were baseless.
Unfortunately, there's a tendency amongst our civilian leaders to look for a person who they believe could be unswerving to them. Often, they could decide upon a darkish horse over one perceived as extra eligible. But about the crunch, it’s the group that acts. There are many such examples in our records.
Although absolutely one of the best political minds in Pakistan’s history, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto made the same mistake by using deciding on Gen Zia over several senior generals thinking that he could be unswerving to him. The effects are a part of the records.
During his 3 terms as a high minister, Nawaz Sharif appointed a minimum of 4 chiefs, clashing with all. In 1999, his government changed into ousted using Gen Musharraf who become his very own appointee. Gen Bajwa, whom Nawaz Sharif holds liable for his removal, was additionally appointed with his aid of him, superseding a few other senior officials.
Interestingly, he become given an extension for a second term by way of Imran Khan who is visible as having the safety status quo’s support during his almost four years in strength. It changed for this reason that the PTI’s rule was often described as ‘hybrid’.
The former top minister has now grown to become his weapons on the leader. The credentials of the man or woman whom Khan as soon described as ‘democratic’ are now being puzzled by way of PTI supporters.
So, all the controversy over who appointed the navy leader was little. The perception of a ‘preferred’ is absolute nonsense. The choice needs to be from among the 4 or five most senior officials who all are alleged to be able to preserve the pinnacle activity. Of path, there may be some who are greater talented. Unfortunately, it's miles the PTI supporters who are publicly naming their ‘preferred’ generals.
A structured transition of the navy command strengthens the institution and enhances its professionalism. This is a lesson all political parties, whether or no longer in electricity, should analyze.
Decisions taken on political grounds can have a poor effect on the organization and the democratic manner. Instead of seeking out a favorite fashionable and in search of the navy’s support, it is a long way more crucial for political events to attention to strengthening the democratic procedure. It is a lesson to be learned from the beyond.